The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But if I'm, I don't know that I'll ever do this, but if I were to do an iron man or something, or run a marathon, under those conditions, I'm basically coming to the race, so to speak, with all the power and strength I'm going to have. And so, there, reducing inflammation is good because it's going to allow me to perform more work, essentially.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you are doing particularly intense training, then you probably want to ratchet up the number of cold exposure sessions that you're doing even if those have to be done on separate days from your training, because a lot of the inflammatory effects of training, endurance and strength training are actually occurring some hours away from the training stimulus.
people are using deliberate cold exposure to reduce inflammation post exercise, to reduce inflammation generally. And people are also using cold to enhance performance in the context of strength training, in the context of endurance training and we'll talk about those data as well