The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now, there are some rules of physics that talk about how the radius of a pipe, and small changes in the radius of a pipe leads to massive increases in the rate and amount of stuff that can flow through that pipe. It's a rule of physics that says, essentially that the radius is proportional to the amount of stuff that can flow through something to the fourth power.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.