The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
One slightly older study, but nonetheless a good study that has relevance here is entitled "Immune system of cold exposed and cold adapted humans." Keep in mind that this study is a little bit extreme. And there are reasons for that. I guess to make a long story short, oftentimes, in order to quote unquote "see an effect in a study," scientists will use conditions that are pretty extreme compared to control group.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.