We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the answer to that that humans probably don't even need these types of things to have the optimal antioxidant response because we know that living a radical life this is not me but somebody swimming near glaciers we know that doing this like I said can be an environment or medic this can increase your glutathione in critical ways so we don't really need to have the things from plants if we can do this
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.