The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So temperature is a powerful stimulus, as we know, for biology, and you've covered a lot of material related to the utility of cold but also the utility of heat, and, as I learn more and more from your content and from the various
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the idea that temperature heat and cold could evoke these tremendous physiological changes that are beneficial for us probably shouldn't surprise us at all I mean I mean this is why we I mean these are not — esoteric mechanisms they're actually the the foundational mechanisms by which our our body and the bodies of other animals adapt