Andrew Huberman· PhD
No obligation to do it, but consider doing it daily for one week and then decide.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
No obligation to do it, but consider doing it daily for one week and then decide.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So if you're going to try and employ these sorts of protocols that were used in the study, I do recommend that you ease into it over the course of a week or so and become somewhat adapted to the, the shock of cold water exposure.
So maybe start at, you know, 50 degrees Fahrenheit, kind of ease your way back in terms of the cold water immersion, especially.
If you are somebody who is not accustomed to it, don't jump right up to that long exposure to cold water. Start with shorter exposures.
And again, don't just jump into 10 minutes of deliberate, cold exposure, please at 35 degrees or 40 degrees or even 45 degrees if you aren't familiar with deliberate cold exposure. You have to ease into these sorts of things over time.