Andrew Huberman· PhD
So I'm imagining that it's a combination of those effects, but it would be very hard to do this in the cold. I feel like the cold is a very potent. I think it takes you too far down that curve, the McGaw curve.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I'm imagining that it's a combination of those effects, but it would be very hard to do this in the cold. I feel like the cold is a very potent. I think it takes you too far down that curve, the McGaw curve.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And no, I am not going to suggest that every time you want to learn something you plunge your arm into ice water. Why won't I suggest that? Well, it will induce the release of adrenaline, but there are better ways to get that adrenaline release.