Andrew Huberman· PhD
Yeah, I think it is. And I think heat shock proteins for example, are driven by that stressful exposure to a change in environment.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Yeah, I think it is. And I think heat shock proteins for example, are driven by that stressful exposure to a change in environment.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Well, guess what? Heat activates that. So what I'm getting at is there is overlap. Cold also activates heat shock proteins. You're like, "Really? Cold?" Yes, it activates. These are stress response pathways, and they are activated by various types of stressors. Now, you're going to more robustly activate heat shock proteins from heat versus cold, but there is some overlap.