The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But the advantage of not doing it too often is that you're not cold adapted. Now, it's very hard for anyone to get truly cold adapted. Some people start to look forward to the cold. And what I think they're looking forward to is the feeling afterward, that dopamine rush. But, if you get cold adapted, then it certainly blunts some of the effect.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
What I can say is once you become cold water adapted, once it no longer has the same impact of novelty, then it will no longer evoke this release.
But if you get cold adapted, then it certainly blunts the some of the effect. Uh but I want to be cold adapted because that means I have more mitochondria in my atapost tissue and and perhaps even muscle like that's been shown.