The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so sometimes the findings on a given colonoscopy will make you want to actually do a more frequent surveillance if you find a CLE pup for example or if a patient has an incomplete bowel prep you might decide you know actually we need to do this a little more urgently and and do it in a year again as opposed to we three great information
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.