The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
where does disease fit into this right because with aging comes more cancer with aging comes more cardiovascular disease with aging comes more dementia and you could argue that those are functional uh certain maybe less so cancer but certainly cardiovascular disease and dementia are very functional forms of decline but of course at their root they have a very cellular component and a very strong set of cellular contributions
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.