The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so there have been uh uh D dutasteride um patients who've taken dutas had symptom but it's not as prominent right and I think probably it's because um a you know a lot of the patients who were taking this were taking it for Alopecia so they were taking finasteride but there have been reports of dutasteride um uh symptoms the same way right so that's I think that's important
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.