Andrew Huberman· PhD
So, you can imagine the depression being something going on and on and on, and you can't break it. So, we have trouble when we get for certain levels of depression, I mean,
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, you can imagine the depression being something going on and on and on, and you can't break it. So, we have trouble when we get for certain levels of depression, I mean,
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think it's, you can envision depression as activities sort of going around in a circuit. And because it's continuous in the nervous system, as signals keep repeating, they tend to get stronger and they can get so strong, you can't break them.