The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So imagine here you have a patient who's had 15 years of pain, ends up in the hospital, goes home, she lost her job, she's on narcotics, she's halfway addicted to these medications. She's depressed. She's anxious. And finally the doctor says, "I think you have endometriosis. Let's take you to surgery." And then they wake her up and say, "You didn't have it."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.