The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they took people that were diagnosed with — major depression okay and they start doing a bunch of metabolomics on them okay now this sounds pretty standard for social media it is actually like pretty heretical like not a lot of — of places have done this right so you know a couple thousand patients blood draws they're they're trying to figure out ask a simple question are there any specific vitamin deficiencies that are associated with depression
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.