Paul Saladino· MD
in terms of plant foods we were much more likely to eat fruit is fructose going to be bad for us probably not especially when it's in fruit something we've been eating for thousands of years hundreds of thousands millions of years
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in terms of plant foods we were much more likely to eat fruit is fructose going to be bad for us probably not especially when it's in fruit something we've been eating for thousands of years hundreds of thousands millions of years
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when he talks about fruit juice as being bad for humans despite a lot of evidence that are Interventional trials in humans that it's not bad for humans