We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the high fructose corn syrup industry loves this so they say hey the problem is people are eating too much but if you control for how much sugar you're eating and we do isochloric studies and we look at short-term studies there's no difference in weight gain and they publish this like in the annals of internal medicine and they say sugar's safe but they miss the point that the sugar is actually causing hunger
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the high fructose corn syrup industry loves this so they say hey um you you you the problem is people are eating too much but if you control for how much sugar you're eating um it there and we do isochoric studies and we look at short-term studies there's no difference in weight gain and they publish this like in the anals of internal medicine and they say Sugar's safe but they missed the point that the sugar is actually causing hunger