Peter Attia· MD
but again I think this is an area where my view has changed quite a bit um and it's changed because of the data right I I just don't see the data to demonstrate that an isocaloric substitution of fructose
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but again I think this is an area where my view has changed quite a bit um and it's changed because of the data right I I just don't see the data to demonstrate that an isocaloric substitution of fructose
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I I just don't see the data to demonstrate that an isocaloric substitution of fructose for glucose is demonstrably worse for health outcomes if total energy intake is preserved
at isocaloric levels do we believe that fructose is more injurious than glucose I.E two you know very similar molecules that happen to have very different Paths of metabolism