Peter Attia· MD
if someone says I'm going to prove that an epigenetic change is responsible for aging they haven't begun to come to grips with the nitty-gritty
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if someone says I'm going to prove that an epigenetic change is responsible for aging they haven't begun to come to grips with the nitty-gritty
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so this idea that reversing the epigenome is reversing aging is at best an exaggeration at worst an outright lie I mean it's just not true how could that be what what a set of experiments technology wise would you need to be able to do to even test that hypothesis say in in a mouse right we're close well maybe close I I guess I should qualify that a little bit um conceptually we're close