The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
he had um you know just around that time invented a technology for measuring the expression of basically all the genes in the genome • with a technique called dna microarrays and that at the time was revolutionary but before that we were always measuring everything in a one or a handful of genes at a time in experiments and now we could measure tens of thousands in one experiment
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.