Peter Attia· MD
in my lab we do what's called partial reprogram when we push them a little bit so that they regain their youth but they don't lose their identity
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
in my lab we do what's called partial reprogram when we push them a little bit so that they regain their youth but they don't lose their identity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what people are trying to do is not reprogram all the way back to the pluripotent state so it's called partial reprogramming right so so which would be pretty dangerous
what if you took a um uh you know a heart cell or a te- cell that's function you know that's lost a lot of function and you give it these yamanaka factors but you know you stop it before it really loses its cell identity will it have gained some properties of its higher functioning youthful State without having having lost it
And you can do this just cells in a dish, we can partially reprogram them and show reversal of the epigenetic clock and other functional improvements in the cells.
So, can I just make an old skin cell a young skin cell but still a skin cell? So, that's the goal.