David Sinclair· PhD
I said we restored their eyesight and the nerves were epigenetically younger.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I said we restored their eyesight and the nerves were epigenetically younger.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We've been putting that into animals and restoring eyesight in old mice and regrowing optic nerves in old mice and it seems to be safe.