The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there was a kind of a central tenant of neuroscience at that time was that critical period plasticity ends around adolescence or one's early 20s and that is simply not true and merenik really I think one of the people who deserves credit for um making it clear that plasticity is ongoing it takes some focus and and work to access it in adulthood but that we can all access neuroplasticity but it it takes it's there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But if a kid learns an instrument, they can do it. - Yeah. - If an adult really focuses and tries to learn an instrument, they can do it. It's just slower in adulthood, in most cases.