Rhonda Patrick· PhD
So, that one we've shown is predictive of mortality above and beyond chronological age.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, that one we've shown is predictive of mortality above and beyond chronological age.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, we actually developed a statistical method that completely removes all this technical noise, and I won't go into the math for people on the podcast, but basically, we can get this down to you can split the sample and now you're getting only about one-year difference at max. Most people are predicted exactly the same age on their two tests.