The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It's so interesting to think about viral infections setting off a bunch of things that are acute like rise in temperature, GI tract disruption, etc. But then, uh, as you said, longer term changes in, uh, genes related to metabolism, inflammation, and other pathways setting a predisposition, uh, a genetic predisposition in motion, kind of like flicking the domino that was already kind of, uh, uh, tilted.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.