The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Best for evaluating interventions for their effect on biological aging: In a recent evaluation of 16 biological aging clocks across 51 interventional studies, DunedinPACE stood out as most reliable by always being either in agreement with a majority of the remaining clocks, or uniquely detecting a change in biological age, where no other clock did (2).
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.