The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the older one, the first one, 2016 or something, cell paper, I remember they showed, in multiple different organs, it seemed to reverse some of the hallmarks of aging, you know, and the organs were performing functionally a little bit, you know, younger than you would imagine, at least in this premature aging mouse model
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.