Andrew Huberman· PhD
So that's a really important point, that you have accelerated aging during the first few years of life, and then it goes linear towards the rest of your life.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So that's a really important point, that you have accelerated aging during the first few years of life, and then it goes linear towards the rest of your life.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what we've discovered as a field is what again a few years ago I wouldn't have believed it but it is true is that this clock starts aging from conception so even as we're growing in the womb our DNA is accumulating these chemical changes these methyls and that extends throughout life forever.