The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
people have looked at epigenetic signatures sort of these signatures that um you know that dictate which genes are going to be expressed and which aren't and there are different patterns between older and younger fathers and you know why what triggering those is not known but there are differences so those could also potentially explain you know some of these risks that we see
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but I think you know there's been a lot of convincing evidence that there could be you know real epigenetic changes that occur with age and mutational changes that occur with age
it's estimated that every year we generate about two mutations in our um you know sperm DNA so you can imagine that you know a 40-year-old is going to have you know 20 or 40 more mutations um than a 20-year-old so that rate does go up