The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and as you mentioned I have a problem with versus because there's this idea that these things are are essentially in opposition well is he that way because of of his Gene variance or is that way because of what what happened to him and I think the thing to realize is that uh experience and heredity interact in all kinds of interesting ways some of which are oppositional and some of which are reinforcing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.