The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and so to to me that's the the burning question is now that we have the ability to characterize that and we know what it looks like um in a higher functioning state which is you know correlates with youth and we are gaining Technologies to be able to modulate that um and actually change the epome as opposed to modifying proteins or Gene Expressions but actually go in and REM methylate and demethylate certain sites
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we are gaining Technologies to be able to modulate that um and actually change the epome as opposed to modifying proteins or Gene Expressions but actually go in and REM methylate and demethylate certain sites um can we kind of reprogram things back to that earlier State
we are gaining Technologies to be able to modulate that — and actually change the epome as opposed to modifying proteins or Gene Expressions but actually go in and REM methylate and demethylate certain sites