Andrew Huberman· PhD
it doesn't mean that after 60 you might not have cardiovascular benefit we start losing the benefit so it's the timing hypothesis is key and it's the years away from estrogen that's the problem
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it doesn't mean that after 60 you might not have cardiovascular benefit we start losing the benefit so it's the timing hypothesis is key and it's the years away from estrogen that's the problem
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.