Peter Attia· MD
We have seen that if you do not use the uh the LCMS assay right which is the very sensitive the liquid chromatography assays the results can be meaningless and I mean truly meaningless
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
We have seen that if you do not use the uh the LCMS assay right which is the very sensitive the liquid chromatography assays the results can be meaningless and I mean truly meaningless
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And then estradi is LCMS as well. The same as what you use for total testosterone.