The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
basically estrogen is better at prevention than cure and it's very protective especially in the Tima of the coronary arteries so taking that estrogen away we lose that protection once the disease builds up there's some worry that adding estrogen once you've developed a sclerosis or a plaque might loosen the plaque especially in that first year
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
once the disease builds up there's some worry that adding estrogen once you've developed a sclerosis or a plaque might loosen the plaque especially in that first year so which led for some people maybe to have a slightly increased risk of stroke