The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think as you said it right there, I think that what happened happened is the women's health initiative happened and hormone therapy all went into the to the alley. It went to the alley and I think one of the ways that these alley do back alley doctors did it was saying, "Oh, we're using the safer version. We're using this compound and we're going to make it 8020 and we're going to use the more safer option."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.