We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
okay so is I guess a few thoughts like one is this a good idea no okay there's nothing about that that's a good idea there's nothing I support I support him as like a like you're such a so if he is awesome is that approach going to enable him to heill no and I was clear with him you're going to sacrifice most likely many more Decades of running quality on that foot yes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.