The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so there there it becomes a really good predictor but that's what I also like when people talk about okay my 60-minute power this is my 60-minute power that's extremely precise way of describing your capabilities because then you at least you have a single point or you have two points you have a power and you have a duration that you're capable of holding in and that gives you already a fairly good idea of the level of the athlete
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.