Andrew Huberman· PhD
Well, who's going to feel that the most, the area where it's torquing, which is at the knee. So the stresses are going to be felt there meanwhile the problem is the foot or the problem is the ankle.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Well, who's going to feel that the most, the area where it's torquing, which is at the knee. So the stresses are going to be felt there meanwhile the problem is the foot or the problem is the ankle.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If you thought of the knee being like the middle of a train track, where the femur down your thigh and your shin down below your knee, where the train track, well, what would happen if the foot collapses at the bottom? All of a sudden that train track on the bottom gets torqued just a little bit. Well, who's going to feel that the most, the area where it's torquing, which is at the knee.