The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
rule number one is that it has to be really hard so he defines this by saying you have a 50 50 shot at finishing whatever it is this misogyny tassie decided to take on it has to be true 50 50 because now i think when people take on challenges especially when there's a physical element they pick things that they know they will finish that are within their capabilities
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.