Andrew Huberman· PhD
We're really talking about probably more than 30 plus minutes at higher than 60% heart rate-- random number, something like that, depends on the person, et cetera. But it has to be a decent chunk.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We're really talking about probably more than 30 plus minutes at higher than 60% heart rate-- random number, something like that, depends on the person, et cetera. But it has to be a decent chunk.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.