The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we're doing our preferred work of let's say sets of five reps five reps again they address both endurance and strength well I guess you better keep a window on both hands right there there's always a conflict you know Thomas saell said there are no Solutions they're only uh they're only uh compromises so you just have to decide which way you want to compromise
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.