Andrew Huberman· PhD
If you just do the program, maintain it consistently, it'll give you such a well-rounded approach to everything.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If you just do the program, maintain it consistently, it'll give you such a well-rounded approach to everything.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If you just do the program, maintain it consistently, it'll give you such a well-rounded approach to everything. And that's the big thing it's I don't want to have to say no. "Hey, can you pick that up?" Yeah. "Can you jump over that?" Yeah. "Can you move that out of the way?" Yep. "Can you move him through time and space?" Yep.
This is just the program. - Mm-hmm. - It keeps me at a super high level.