The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Yeah, I write a monthly research review with three other PhDs, uh, Eric Trexler, Eric Helms, and Michael Zordos. And we release that, like I said, monthly. And it's all sorts of topics in health, fitness, wellness, and we kind of break down the latest science and give you actionable take-homes.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.