The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the traditional thinking on this is we go down the lactate pathway when we are demanding ATP faster than oxygen can be supplied to the mitochondria and that's why it's referred to as this anob pathway and if we you know if we have the time if the ATP demand is low enough that we can afford to get oxygen to the mitochondria well then we would always preferentially go down the oxidative phosphorilation pathway
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.