The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this is a full-fledged like a wind tunnel basically water is circulated full crosssectional area around in a in in a huge uh huge uh Circle and there is basically a three three times 3 m wide 1 and A2 M deep uh 5 meter five six meter long crosssection area of water just passing through over or past you like you were in in in an endless ocean swimming in an ocean water is water quality is perfect there's no turbulence no n just pure water running past
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.