The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as you know 200 watts is not a lot of watts of course so it was not hard to hold that for the 80 kilometers but you know over the span of a year I think if I remember correctly we were able to increase our velocity from maybe I want to say like 20 and a half miles per hour to maybe 22 miles per hour which is a very significant Improvement in efficiency
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
over the span of a year I think if I remember correctly we were able to increase our velocity from maybe I want to say like 20 and a half miles per hour to maybe 22 miles per hour which is a very significant Improvement in efficiency