So having some structure-- and this structure can be fairly loose, so we're going to talk about a bunch of different examples-- is something I strongly encourage everyone to utilize for their exercise.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So having some structure-- and this structure can be fairly loose, so we're going to talk about a bunch of different examples-- is something I strongly encourage everyone to utilize for their exercise.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there is clear evidence that having a program is better than not, regardless of the effectiveness of the program.