The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But that's a better way to maybe group similar muscle actions together, which I think, I definitely prefer that, because if I'm going to be training pulling movements, at least there there's a synergy between them. And I feel like I'm looking to achieve one goal that day.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Um, and then I mean quite honestly, you can go back to the bros split days and those those still work effectively. There's a reason why they worked in the past. Like I think that science shows that there's smarter ways to do them these days. Like you can you can come back and hit a related muscle. So you could do let's say biceps on one day and then come back two days later and do back realizing again synergy between the the exercises there. Your biceps are going to get reimulated again. So you could figure out ways to make that work.