Andrew Huberman· PhD
So you really want to think about this as not a standard number. You should maintain consistent work output for over 20 plus minutes.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So you really want to think about this as not a standard number. You should maintain consistent work output for over 20 plus minutes.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So really, if you look at a minimal number there, it's generally 20 minutes of what we're looking for, but a more typical would be 20 to 60 minutes.