Well, this exercise is literally putting you in elevation and internal rotation. And if you were to walk into a PT office and someone said, "I think he's got impingement, will you diagnose him?"
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Well, this exercise is literally putting you in elevation and internal rotation. And if you were to walk into a PT office and someone said, "I think he's got impingement, will you diagnose him?"
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So the upright row is when is, you know, done the way that people, you know, old school taught how to do the lift. You hold the barbell and you lift it up here up up under your chin. Your elbows are much higher than your wrists are. You've got lots of weight usually on the exercise. So more fully pushing your arms down to internal rotation. The funny thing about that is that that that position is literally the test as a physical therapist that we would put somebody in to try to see if they have impingement in their shoulder.